PRACTICING AND ARGUING FOR ABSTINENCE FROM SMOKING: A TEST OF THE DOUBLE FORCED COMPLIANCE PARADIGM
Saved in:
JOULE, R.V., PRACTICING AND ARGUING FOR ABSTINENCE FROM SMOKING: A TEST OF THE DOUBLE FORCED COMPLIANCE PARADIGM. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 21, no. 2 (1991), p. 119-129.
Ref.
38006
Location:
SIIS R,827
Palabras clave:
Actitudes sociales, Drogodependencias, Modificación de conducta, Opinión pública, Tabaquismo
Actitudes sociales, Drogodependencias, Modificación de conducta, Opinión pública, Tabaquismo
Similar Items: PRACTICING AND ARGUING FOR ABSTINENCE FROM SMOKING: A TEST OF THE DOUBLE FORCED COMPLIANCE PARADIGM
- REINFORCING COMPLIANCE WITH NON-DRUG - RELATED ACTIVITIES.
- THE DIFFERENCE CONTEXT MAKES: AMERICANS' VIEWS ON ABSTINENCE AND IMPAIRMENT
- IS AN ABSTINENCE-BASED 12-STEP MODEL THE BEST WAY TO TREAT ADDICTIONS?
- BLOWING SMOKE: HOW CIGARETTE MANUFACTURERS ARGUED THAT NICOTINE IS NOT ADDICTIVE
- Arguing the case: Committing pregnant substance abusers to compulsory care
- EFFECT OF THREE SMOKING CESSATION TREATMENTS ON NICOTINE WITHDRAWAL IN 141 ABSTINENT ALCOHOLIC SMOKERS